Psychological Models are a useful tool in understanding the unhealthy behaviours people are susceptible to from addiction. Psychological models hypothesise that substance addictions originate from psychological irregularities or abnormalities. The psychoanalytic models of addiction are associated with ‘self-medication’ theory – substance use is the individual’s attempt to ameliorate the emotional pain caused by trauma or ego deficits (Cavaiola, 2009).
Psychological Models are a useful tool in understanding the unhealthy behaviours people are susceptible to from addiction.
What are the Psychological Models of Addiction?
Psychological models hypothesise that substance addictions originate from psychological irregularities or abnormalities.
Psychoanalytical Models
The psychoanalytic models of addiction are associated with ‘self-medication’ theory – substance use is the individual’s attempt to ameliorate the emotional pain caused by trauma or ego deficits (Cavaiola, 2009).
Sigmund Freud’s (1923) personality theory describes the human psyche as consisting of three parts:
- the id – the primitive and instinctual part that contains sexual and aggressive drives and hidden memories
- the super-ego – the moral conscience
- the ego – the realistic part that mediates between the desires of the id and the super-ego.
Each part comprises unique features, yet they interact to form a whole, and each part contributes to behaviour. Psychoanalytic theories explain addiction as an imbalance between the id, superego, and ego. When the id overpowers the ego and superego, a person may take substances without thinking of the consequences.
Other Psychological Models of Addiction
Other psychoanalytic theorists explain addiction as intrapsychic conflict from an overly harsh superego. From this perspective, substance use represents a way of escaping anxiety, fear or rage. Other Neo-Freudians believe trauma underpins addiction and addictive behaviour develop as a way to cope with the trauma. This explanation finds some validity in the high correlation between post-traumatic stress disorders and substance use (Mills et al., 2006).
Psychopathology Models
Research has shown a correlation between addiction and types of mental disorders, including;
- Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
- Conduct and other oppositional disorders
- Mood disorders
- Anti-social, borderline and narcissistic personality disorders.
Correlation does not imply causality, however, there are some instances where the self-medication hypothesis can also be applied to these models as causal agents. (Cavaiola, 2009).
Personality Models
This group of models explains addiction through personality variables and individual temperaments. These include:
- high need for novelty-seeking
- harm avoidance
- reward dependence
- low ego resiliency and poor ego control
- low attention span
- high emotionality and mood instability
- low sociability and social withdrawal
- low activity level
- low flexibility (Cavaiola, 2009).
References
Cavaiola, A.A. (2009). Psychological models of addiction. In N.A. Roget & G.L. Fisher (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of Substance Abuse Prevention, Treatment, and Recovery. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Mills, K.L., Teesson, M., Ross, J., & Peters, L. (2006). Trauma, PTSD, and substance use disorders: findings from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(4), 652-658.
The psychological aspect of addiction is very different from its physical aspects.
The physical side of drug and alcohol abuse has been studied for centuries so there is an enormous amount of research surrounding the physical effects of substance abuse. The physical toll that addiction can have on a person is common knowledge; however, despite how debilitating substance abuse can be, people still engage in drug and alcohol abuse. Why? Our drug and alcohol treatment center in Chicago knows that addiction has just as much to do with the mind as it does with the body, and that’s why we’re looking into the psychology behind addiction.
What Is Psychological Dependence?
The term “psychology” refers to behavioral processes that relate to mood, emotions, or the mind. Psychological dependence has to do with the emotional and mental processes that relate to the development and recovery from a substance abuse disorder or addiction. Our moods and behaviors take root in the mind. When you begin to use drugs or alcohol, the way you think and feel changes. Once a person becomes accustomed to experiencing certain thoughts and moods while high, their minds become just as addicted as their bodies. The psychological aspect of addiction is just as serious as physical dependency. The two do not exist separate from each other but are rather intertwined to create an overall addiction.
Our cognitive behavioral therapy in Chicago focuses on the psychology behind addiction by helping patients realize the emotions and thought patterns associated with their substance abuse disorder. CBT is one of the several addiction therapies we offer at Banyan Treatment Centers Chicago.
Addiction Side Effects Associated With Psychological Addiction
Emotion plays a big role in substance abuse. People may turn to drugs or alcohol to cope with negative emotions and they may associate certain positive emotions with these substances. Psychological dependence is largely referred to as the cognitive and emotional aspects of addiction or withdrawal from drugs and alcohol. Rather than the body’s physical change as a result of drug abuse, the psychological model of addiction is centered on emotions related to using these substances. The most common psychological symptoms of addiction include:
- Addiction cravings
- Experiencing anxiety when they attempt to quit
- Experiencing depression symptoms when they’re not using or trying to stop using
- Feeling irritable when they’re not using or trying to quit
- Mood swings associated with quitting or lack of drug use
- Loss of appetite associated with not using or quitting
- Denial about the addiction
- Obsessing about using or obtaining the substance in question
- Trouble with decision-making when not using or trying to quit
- Difficulties concentrating when not using or trying to quit
Because the psychological symptoms of addiction can’t be measured, it’s difficult to pinpoint their intensity. While we can’t determine a person’s subjective level of mental distress, we do know that drug addiction and alcoholism can cause severe psychological dependency.
Common Substances Linked to Psychological Dependence
Certain substances produce more and clearer symptoms of psychological dependence. Some of the most common drugs associated with symptoms of psychological dependence include:
- Cocaine
- Crack cocaine
- Amphetamine
- Methamphetamine
- LSD
- Mescaline
- PCP
- DMT
- Psilocybin
- Ecstasy (MDMA)
- Cannabis (Marijuana)
- Inhalants
- Antidepressants
Treating the psychological factors of drug addiction and alcoholism is just as important as treating the physical ones. If you or someone you know is battling addiction, call Banyan Chicago at 888-280-4763 to learn more about our rehab center and our unique programs and therapies for addiction.
Over the years, psychological principles have contributed to the development of many theories about substance use disorders and addiction. Learning theories represent one set of psychological principles that have had a strong influence on our understanding of the causes of addiction, as well as informing some of our intervention strategies. Relevant learning theories include both operant and classical conditioning principles.
The classical conditioning process helps explain why stimuli in the environment or sensations originating from inside the body often trigger a person’s craving for a substance. Certain areas of the brain may be triggered just by seeing the paraphernalia used to administer a drug, inducing an intense craving for the drug. This is no different, really, from Pavlov’s dogs learning to associate food with the ringing of a bell through classical conditioning, and drooling over the previously irrelevant sound. The craving trigger stimulus from the environment might involve any of the five senses: hearing, seeing, touching, smelling, or tasting. Or, craving may be triggered by familiar internal states (like anxiety, depression, loneliness) that were previously alleviated by taking drugs.
Operant conditioning is all about rewards and punishments. A person might use a drug for the first time and enjoy the feelings it creates, which is a positive reinforcement for the behavior. Similarly, the person might find that the drug decreases a negative feeling like pain, low mood, or anxiety. This, too, would be reinforcing—what we call negative reinforcement. These basic learning theories are taken a step further with an understanding of social learning theory. A person does not necessarily have to experience the rewards and punishments themselves; learning also happens by watching others engage in the behavior and seeing what happens to them.
Through observational learning, we learn to imitate both the precise behaviors and general classes of behavior modeled by others in our social environment. In other words, a person might not imitate a parent who uses alcohol for relaxation from stress (the specific or precise behavior) but imitates the general class of behavior being modeled by using marijuana this way.
This concept leads to another set of psychological principles in addiction: drug or alcohol expectancies. Expectancies are the set of beliefs individuals develop regarding how using these substances might affect them. A person develops expectancies from many sources: other people, television, movies, music, news, social media, and others, including their own personal prior experiences with the drug.
Even young children have been shown to develop both positive and negative expectancies about the outcomes of drinking alcohol (Donovan, Molina, & Kelly, 2009).
Simply put, alcohol or other drug use is more likely if positive outcomes are expected than if negative outcomes are expected. Results from the 2016 Monitoring the Future study of middle and high school students are informative here. The students were asked to rate the harmfulness of various substance use behaviors in terms of how much they believed a person risks self-harm (physical or other ways) by using specific substances. Figure 1 shows a portion of the results from the 8th, 10th, and 12th graders. As you can see, the students expected less potential harm with an experimental trial of these substances (once or twice) compared to occasional or regular use. They also distinguished between the potential harm of using different types of substances, especially they viewed alcohol and marijuana as being less harmful than the other substances. This estimate of harmfulness represents an expectancy related to using these substances in the described patterns.
Figure 1. Percent reporting “great risk” if a person…
Substance use pattern
8th graders
10th graders
12th graders
Try one or two drinks of an alcoholic beverage
14.7
13.3
9.5
Take one or two drinks nearly every day
30.7
32.2
21.6
Have five or more drinks once or twice each weekend
53.4
54.5
48.4
Try marijuana once or twice
22.8
16.4
12.9
Smoke marijuana occasionally
36.8
24.4
17.1
Smoke marijuana regularly
57.5
44
31.1
Try heroin once or twice without using a needle
59.2
73.3
66.1
Take heroin occasionally without using a needle
70.3
82.2
74.6
Try inhalants once
32
40.7
—
Take inhalants regularly
52.1
59.7
—
Take LSD once or twice
22.6
34.4
31.7
Take LSD regularly
36.8
55.2
58.2
Try cocaine once or twice
44.3
54.6
52.7
Take cocaine occasionally
62.4
70.9
68.6
Try any narcotic other than heroin (codeine, Vicodin, OxyContin, Percocet, etc.) once or twice
—
—
43.6
Take any narcotic other than heroin occasionally
—
—
55.7
Take any narcotic other than heroin regularly
—
—
72.4
Yet another set of psychological theories address human information processing. This area of cognitive psychology explains how substance use can affect the way that a person takes in (perceives) information from the environment, stores the information as a short-term memory, moves information into long-term memory, and later retrieves information in order to influence behavior.
Research suggests that when a person learns something while under the influence of a drug, it is possible that they will not be able to retrieve what they learned later, when the person is in a sober state—there simply will not be enough retrieval cues available to trigger the recall. This information processing framework not only has tremendous implications for how individuals function when taking psychotropic substances, but also how they often have to re-learn many things once they enter into recovery or quit using after a period of regular use.
Past clinical literature includes discussions about the “addictive personality.” This concept presumes the existence of specific personality traits that characterize individuals who develop substance use or addiction disorders. The idea is that people are predisposed to developing addiction based on specific personality traits (in much the same way we might theorize a predisposition based on genetics). While there may be some characteristics commonly observed in the population of individuals with substance use disorders, the evidence does not support there being a universal set of personality traits or a personality type associated with addiction—evidence for the existence of an “addictive personality” type does not really exist (per Szalavitz, 2016 citing an interview with George Koob, director of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism). An argument discussed by Szalavitz (2016) is the observation that 18% of persons with an addiction also have “a personality disorder characterized by lying, stealing, lack of conscience, and manipulative antisocial behavior.” While this rate of 18% is more than four times the rate seen across the general population, it still means the 82% of people experiencing addiction do not fit that characteristic. This is the case with study after study of personality traits. The population of people experiencing addiction is tremendously diverse and heterogeneous on all fronts: demographics and personality alike. This also means that pretty much anyone, regardless of personality type, could potentially develop an addiction if the right (or wrong) combination of factors come together.
There are psychodynamic, attachment theory, and self-medication perspectives about addiction to consider, as well. These psychological approaches suggest that a person uses drugs to fill a terrific void in their emotional lives or as a means of quieting voices of inner conflict. A person might be using the drugs to find relief from physical or emotional pain.
These are called self-medication theories. In this line of thinking, a person uses substances to avoid or blunt their negative or disturbing feelings, as in the Pink Floyd song lyrics: “I have become comfortably numb.” The underlying basis for the pain that is being medicated is usually attributed to trauma—adverse childhood experiences (ACES), sexual or violence trauma as an adult, or other experiences associated with post-traumatic stress. We do know that trauma experiences and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are commonly reported among women and men with substance use disorders (we will learn more about this in Module 14 when we talk about co-occurring problems). However, it is a gross oversimplification to attribute this association to self-medication efforts. The aftermath of trauma is complex and variable, involving changes in (1) neurological pathways–especially the amygdala that we studied in Module 3, that keeps signally the presence of threat long after the threat is past, (2) changes in biology, and (3) changes in how a person interfaces with the social environment. Furthermore, trauma is often a consequence of substance misuse, not only an antecedent. Regardless, practitioners are now very aware of how important it is to screen and assess for both PTSD and substance use disorders, and to treat both issues together if they co-occur.
The remaining readings in this module elaborate further about these psychological models and theories.
